Diagnosing Culture
#Diagnosing Culture
There is a culture diagnostic tool developed by Kim Cameron and Robert Quinn in 2006. It essentially states there are four types of organizational cultures, which exist along a competing values framework. The competing values are:
Flexibility & Discretion vs. Stability & Control
Internal Focus & Integration vs. External Focus & Differentiation
Using these values, Cameron and Quinn group organizations into four cultural categories depending on their results:
Clan Culture: collaborative, friendly, teamwork abounds, colleagues are like family, leaders are mentors, emphasizes loyalty, tradition, cohesion, and concern for people.
Adhocracy Culture: creative, dynamic, entrepreneurial, cutting edge, risk-taking, initiative and freedom are encouraged, being an industry leader is important
Market Culture: competitive, results and goal oriented, hard-charging, productive, concerned with reputation, success, and winning
Hierarchy Culture: controlled, structured, formal, rules and procedures emphasized, dependability, stability, performance, and efficient operations are prioritized
###First, identify the culture you want. Many governments identify as a Hierarchy Culture and aspire to be different. But it is important to be specific and articulate what kind of culture you want, so the differences become clear. As you complete a diagnostic process, make note of the differences between the culture you have and the one you want.
###Second, interview and observe.
Observe the common behaviors in your organization and ask others to observe them as well.
Which behaviors contribute to your goals?
Which behaviors detract from your goals?
If you were performing at your best, which behaviors would be common? Which would be gone?
How would we treat residents differently?
How would employees exchange ideas with one another?
How would challenging issues get raised and resolved within the organization?
Notice what words people use when they describe the challenges and opportunities in their organization
Do they say “us” and “we” or do they say “they” or “them.” The latter may indicate a lack of ownership in both the problem and the solution.
For example, do people talk as if “data” is someone else’s domain, like the IT department?
Do they say “can’t” or “won’t” or “shouldn’t” more than they say “can” or “could” or “should?” These words choices indicate the level of risk aversion and innovation among employees.
Do they more frequently talk about challenges than opportunities? Or is it the reverse?
Do they contribute to each other’s ideas or tear them down?
Do they talk about they way things used to be with nostalgia? Or do they talk about the way things could be with optimism?
Can they explain why they do certain activities or why your programs operate the way they do? Or do they put those answers to a person higher in the organization?
Conduct interviews with employees at all levels of the organization. Focus on those who are well respected, informally influential, and attuned to the organization's culture.
Ask everyone who they consider the ultimate stakeholder. The differences in perspectives will reveal cultural disconnects and opportunities for alignment around a common mission and vision.
Interview stakeholders about their perceptions of the organization? Ask them about their experiences as a “customer” and write down the common words they use to describe those experiences.
Treat perceptions of the organization as facts.
Identify the sub-cultures and micro-cultures through interviews, and analyze social media feedback and differences between component perceptions.
###Fourth, consider how the following factors are influencing your culture:
Organizational Structure and Process
Centralization vs. decentralization
Autonomy vs. micro-management
Reporting structures and spans of control
Decision making processes
Information flows
People
Leaders
Managers
Front Lines
Customers
Stakeholders
Incentives
Compensation
Seniority
Recognition
Access
Performance Management
Results/Evaluations
Feedback
Frequency
Remediation/Accountability
Last updated